20290830
If Evans’ experience is a canary in a coal mine, the whole generative AI field, at least at current valuations, could come to a fairly swift end. Coders would continue to use it, and marketers who have to write a lot of copy to promote their products in order to increase search engine rankings would, too. But neither coding nor high-speed, mediocre quality copy-writing are remotely enough to maintain current valuation dreams.
People: Sportwashing? Challenges of beekeeping. Optimizing wellbeing by saying hi to six neighbours. Discourse on winning and loosing [PDF]. Removing stuff. Capitulation of Grimes - but using AI to generate songs, provided profits are shared too.
Science: Pine’s demon - 3D plasmon. Do insects feel love and pain? Predicting earthquakes with GPS. Solar grazing. Learning from paper airplanes.
Future: 10 visions of 2023. Futures from ruins. AI for work-life balance. Uphill thinking. Imagineering A Better Future.
AI: What if GenAI was a dud? Politics - the AI power paradox. Does ChatGPT dream of electric sheep [PDF]? Llama-2-70B performs at the same level as OpenAI’s GPT-4 in summarisation tasks, but 30x cheaper.
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fc16463f2-daf3-4654-b705-961e51703488_481x304.png)
Also..
![A study showing using GitHub CoPilot is very productive. A study showing using GitHub CoPilot is very productive.](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fc14e000f-398f-4f77-9b53-3aa99e071386_963x818.jpeg)